Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #6341: Packaging - virtual provides "postgres" without version

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: nelson-m-marques(at)ext(dot)ptinovacao(dot)pt, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6341: Packaging - virtual provides "postgres" without version
Date: 2011-12-23 17:46:55
Message-ID: 26941.1324662415@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM,  <nelson-m-marques(at)ext(dot)ptinovacao(dot)pt> wrote:
>> Currently your binary distribution of PostgreSQL for Enterprise Linux has a
>> virtual provides for 'postgresql' which has no version associated with it
>> (there's good and bad things depending on usage regarding this
>> methodology).

> The PostgreSQL project doesn't have any direct control over Red Hat's
> spec files, although Tom Lane, a PostgreSQL core team member, also
> works at Red Hat.  I would suggest that you take this up with Red Hat
> directly...

There is no such Provides: in the Red Hat spec files, so I would assume
that this complaint is actually about the PGDG RPMs.  Devrim?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2011-12-23 18:58:41
Subject: Re: user names & non-ASCII
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-12-23 17:25:31
Subject: Re: BUG #6340: to_timestamp() miscalculates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group