| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | lenka(dot)piyush(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #6461: "-t" deletes primary key |
| Date: | 2012-02-19 16:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | 26918.1329670215@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On fre, 2012-02-17 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> lenka(dot)piyush(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
>>> when i restore a particular table using pg_restore (using option "-t") it
>>> doesn't restore my primary key...
>> This is not a bug. -t selects the table only, not associated indexes.
> But from a user's perspective, that behavior seems kind of useless.
Well, I can see the possible usefulness of a switch that says "give me
this table and all associated indexes/constraints" (other than FK
constraints, likely). But it would be something new, not -t.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MauMau | 2012-02-19 22:32:19 | [Bug fix] postmaster always crashes on a debug version of Windows |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2012-02-19 11:25:06 | Re: BUG #6461: "-t" deletes primary key |