Re: information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Konstantin Izmailov <kizmailov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB
Date: 2009-06-01 03:06:32
Message-ID: 26862.1243825592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is this a regression relative to 8.3? If not, why not leave it for
> 8.5?

No. it's not a regression. What I was concerned about was mainly that
it seemed likely to drop off the radar screen without being addressed at
all, since most of the other things Konstantin complained about seemed
to be we-won't-change-this items. I have no objection to a conscious
decision to leave it alone for 8.4, so long as it gets memorialized as
either a pending patch or a TODO item.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-01 03:08:19 Re: Win32 link() function
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-06-01 02:57:14 Re: information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB