| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: ecpg localization |
| Date: | 2008-05-02 23:19:00 |
| Message-ID: | 26858.1209770340@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Samstag, 26. April 2008 schrieb Euler Taveira de Oliveira:
>> One of the few parts of the core that is not localized is the ecpg.
>> Attached is a patch that builds the basic infrastructure to make it
>> possible.
> Looks good for a start, but what is missing in this patch is that mmerror and
> the other functions actually call gettext. So currently this patch doesn't
> achieve a lot.
Well, it was only advertised as infrastructure, not a completed feature.
I'm wondering whether it would be appropriate to apply now despite being
incomplete. The patch touches enough places in ecpg that code drift is
likely to be a serious problem if it has to sit around for long.
Ultimately Michael's opinion is the one that matters most for ecpg
stuff, anyway. Michael?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-02 23:23:34 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 23:05:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |