Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Updated open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updated open items
Date: 2005-07-30 14:51:08
Message-ID: 26725.1122735068@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> . the thread "windows regression failure - prepared xacts" - in another 
> thread here: 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-07/msg00621.php Tom 
> proposed a possible cause for the problem seen (race conditions in 
> is_visible() and friends) and several possible solutions, but I am not 
> sure we ever resolved the issue, did we?

AFAIK the regression test failure has not recurred since I tweaked the
\d query issued by psql, but the question of whether we want to make a
semantic change in is_visible() is still open.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-30 14:52:02
Subject: Re: Interval->day docs and regression tests
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-30 14:42:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-30 14:52:05
Subject: pgsql: Please find attached diffs for documentation and simple
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-30 14:36:41
Subject: Re: Updated open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group