Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> . the thread "windows regression failure - prepared xacts" - in another 
> thread here: 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-07/msg00621.php Tom 
> proposed a possible cause for the problem seen (race conditions in 
> is_visible() and friends) and several possible solutions, but I am not 
> sure we ever resolved the issue, did we?

AFAIK the regression test failure has not recurred since I tweaked the
\d query issued by psql, but the question of whether we want to make a
semantic change in is_visible() is still open.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Updated open items at 2005-07-30 14:32:45 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

• Re: Updated open items at 2005-07-30 14:53:20 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-07-30 14:52:02
	Subject: Re: Interval->day docs and regression tests
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-07-30 14:42:41
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-07-30 14:52:05
	Subject: pgsql: Please find attached diffs for documentation and simple
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-07-30 14:36:41
	Subject: Re: Updated open items