Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)
Date: 2000-11-02 20:42:43
Message-ID: 26714.973197763@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, your feelings on this?  Does Lamar's argument change anything?

Not for me.  I understand Lamar's concern, but the time to be responding
to it was two weeks ago, not today.  7.0.3 is long overdue already ---
and in fact would be out now, had you not been out of town earlier this
week, no?

I also don't like the fact that a commit change appeared without any
prior discussion or even notice ... not the way to do things for a
patch-release, IMHO.

Basically I want to get 7.0.3 out the door so we can focus our full
attention on getting 7.1 to beta.  Last-minute marginal hacks are not
the way to go.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-02 21:05:54
Subject: Re: Why is failure to find file a "NOTICE"?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-02 20:32:58
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: momjianDate: 2000-11-02 20:53:27
Subject: pgsql/doc (TODO)
Previous:From: Karl DeBisschopDate: 2000-11-02 20:32:47
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group