Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump - segfault with -z option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump - segfault with -z option
Date: 1998-11-24 17:21:48
Message-ID: 26692.911928108@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> pg_dump should not lose it to the extent of segfaulting :-)

> I believe this will be fixed in the first 6.4 minor release.

If you meant that it has already been fixed, I don't think so.
I see only one post-6.4 patch so far against pg_dump, and it fixes
a wrong-output kind of problem, not a core-dump kind of problem.

BTW, is Oliver intending to try to fix pg_dump's inherited-constraints
problems in time for 6.4.1, or is that a longer-range project?

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 1998-11-24 17:29:22 Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug?
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 1998-11-24 17:11:09 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump - segfault with -z option