Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Small bug with numeric in 7.0 (also in 6.5.3)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb(at)aeccom(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Raul Chirea <raul(at)brahms(dot)ro>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small bug with numeric in 7.0 (also in 6.5.3)
Date: 2000-05-15 14:06:40
Message-ID: 26688.958399600@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb(at)aeccom(dot)com> writes:
> $ pg_dump cs1 -o > /tmp/x.dump
> parseNumericArray: bogus number

IIRC, this is what you see when you run a 6.5 pg_dump against a 7.0
database (or perhaps it was vice versa).

There's been talk of putting stricter version checking into pg_dump,
but that might introduce its own problems...

			regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Raul ChireaDate: 2000-05-16 12:42:49
Subject: Re: Small bug with numeric in 7.0 (also in 6.5.3)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-05-11 15:12:59
Subject: Re: Number of tuples in pg_class - bug or misunderstanding?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group