Re: mingw format warnings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mingw format warnings
Date: 2011-01-28 22:34:46
Message-ID: 26687.1296254086@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/28/2011 03:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Are any of them substantive, or are they all about %m ?

> [andrew(at)aurelia ]$ grep 'warning.*format' frogmouth-make*.log | sed
> 's/.*warning:/warning:/' | sort | uniq -c

I'd say a lot of those probably need attention. It might be all right
to assume DWORD == int, but even there I'd feel safer with a cast.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-01-28 22:35:14 Re: mingw format warnings
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-01-28 22:28:43 Re: mingw format warnings