Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 10/24/2010 07:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> Why do we need the is_trigger flag at all for the plperl hash key? At
>>> first glance it strikes me as unnecessary.
>> We might not. Does the presence or absence of the $_TD hash reference
>> have any impact on what we cache, or what Perl might cache internally?
> For both trigger and non-trigger functions, we compile this ahead of the
> user-set function code:
> our $_TD; local $_TD=shift;
> Non-trigger functions get passed "undef" to correspond to this invisible
> argument, while trigger functions get passed the hashref that the
> trigger calling code has set up.
Seems like we don't need it then. You going to get rid of it?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-10-25 01:38:41|
|Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-10-25 01:22:57|
|Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |