Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> If I understand you're suggestion, queries of the form
>>> SELECT * FROM rel
>>> WHERE ARRAY[ 1,2,3,4 ] <= x
>>> AND x <=ARRAY[ 1, 2, 3, 1000];
>>> would no longer use an index. Is that correct?
>> No, just that we'd no longer have statistics relevant to that, and would
>> have to fall back on default selectivity assumptions.
> Which, currently, would mean queries of that form would typically use
> a table scan, right?
No, it doesn't.
> What about MCV's? Will those be removed as well?
Sure. Those seem even less useful.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: A.M.||Date: 2012-02-29 23:22:27|
|Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation|
|Previous:||From: Nathan Boley||Date: 2012-02-29 23:02:41|
|Subject: Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays|