Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: stats_block_level

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Date: 2007-07-31 17:17:29
Message-ID: 26650.1185902249@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Methinks it should be: stats_<something>, so that people find it in the
>> same place as stats_query_string, which is still there.

> Hum, but the order in postgresql.conf is arbitrary, right?

I concur with Simon that it should have some relationship to
stats_query_string.  However, stats_collection doesn't appeal to me
because that sounds like it would subsume stats_query_string (it seems
like a master control toggle, as stats_start_collector used to be).
Maybe something like stats_count_events?

Or we could get radical and rename both of them...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-07-31 17:21:20
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] allow CSV quote in NULL
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2007-07-31 17:16:57
Subject: Re: Machine available for community use

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group