Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Interval month, week -> day

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interval month, week -> day
Date: 2006-09-01 00:32:28
Message-ID: 26641.1157070748@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
> On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:12 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> I agree that this seems like an oversight in the original
>> months/days/seconds patch, rather than behavior we want to keep.
>> But is DecodeInterval the only place with the problem?

> I'll check on this tonight. Any idea where I might start to look?

I'd look at the input routines for all the datetime types and see where
they go.  It's entirely possible that DecodeInterval is the only place
with the problem, but I'd not assume that without looking.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-09-01 00:55:11
Subject: Re: Status on Fedora Core Extras packaging
Previous:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2006-09-01 00:16:28
Subject: Re: Interval month, week -> day

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-01 02:03:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure
Previous:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2006-09-01 00:16:28
Subject: Re: Interval month, week -> day

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group