Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large C files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large C files
Date: 2011-09-08 19:10:24
Message-ID: 26604.1315509024@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this.

Personally, I'm neither intending to break up xlog.c right now, nor
asking you to do it.  I'm just objecting to your claim that there
should be some project-policy restriction on when refactoring gets done.
I do have other refactoring-ish plans in mind, eg
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/9232.1315441364@sss.pgh.pa.us
and am not going to be happy if you claim I can't do that now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-09-08 19:20:14
Subject: pg_dump.c
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-09-08 19:02:32
Subject: Re: Protecting against multiple instances per cluster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group