"Barry Lind" <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> On Oracle 9.2 you get 0, 0, 0, and 2 rows.
Really!? Well, we always knew they were a bit standards-challenged ;-).
I have more faith in DB2 being an accurate implementation of the spec.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Laszlo Hornyak||Date: 2005-03-10 23:35:07|
|Subject: Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies|
|Previous:||From: Nicolai Tufar||Date: 2005-03-10 22:43:48|
|Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests|
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-03-10 23:49:47|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause |
|Previous:||From: Mark Shewmaker||Date: 2005-03-10 22:42:07|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY|