Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: unknown conversion %m

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unknown conversion %m
Date: 2011-04-28 14:07:31
Message-ID: 26588.1303999651@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Yeah, I think that the underscore variants got added because of cases 
> like ours where printf is sometimes defined as a macro. I'll just need 
> to make sure that this gets set before there's any possibility of that 
> happening.

The existing code would already be broken if that were the case,
so I see no need to worry.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Daniele VarrazzoDate: 2011-04-28 14:29:38
Subject: Re: Extension Packaging
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-04-28 14:04:26
Subject: Re: Extension Packaging

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group