"Carl Shelbourne" <Carl(dot)Shelbourne(at)marconi(dot)com> writes:
> I'm a little concerned about the indifference towards *nix ODBC. People are
> using it. We particularly use the unixODBC version.
> It seems to me that the ODBC interface is beginning to splinter, with *nix
> looking very much like a third class citizen. Of carse its easy for me to
> complain, from my point of very little understanding, but from Hiroshi
> Inoue post on 18 Feb:
> The recent changes were made by me mostly and I have no ODBC environment on *nix. So the changes are mainly for Windows.
> Is there no way that commited changes can be checked for impact on both communities, ok its good to see development continuing on the driver, but do
> the changes have to be platform specific?
Somebody needs to take responsibility for checking the Unix version.
Are you volunteering?
(Hiroshi does quite enough work around here already; if he doesn't want
to run portability checks on the ODBC code, I can hardly blame him.)
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Carl Shelbourne||Date: 2002-02-19 15:29:47|
|Subject: Re: odbc on unix|
|Previous:||From: Henshall, Stuart - WCP||Date: 2002-02-19 14:13:28|
|Subject: Re: serious trouble with bool and Access|