Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling
Date: 2000-03-08 19:54:23
Message-ID: 26543.952545263@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
> Any suggestions on how I might handle this?

Er ... run 7.0beta ? Probably a cleaner answer than hacking up your
app to implement an incomplete workaround for that 6.5 bug.

Year before last, I moved my company's production applications onto
a pre-alpha 6.4 snapshot, because we were getting killed by a bad bug
in 6.3.*. It made me pretty nervous, but guess what: we didn't have
any problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-03-08 20:12:38 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-03-08 19:49:32 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question