Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling
Date: 2000-03-08 19:54:23
Message-ID: 26543.952545263@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
> Any suggestions on how I might handle this? 

Er ... run 7.0beta ?  Probably a cleaner answer than hacking up your
app to implement an incomplete workaround for that 6.5 bug.

Year before last, I moved my company's production applications onto
a pre-alpha 6.4 snapshot, because we were getting killed by a bad bug
in 6.3.*.  It made me pretty nervous, but guess what: we didn't have
any problems.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-03-08 20:12:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-03-08 19:49:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] library policy question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group