Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 16:01:41
Message-ID: 26515.1112630501@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> ... If there are no license or build issues I'm in favor.

Peter has pointed out that the problem of circular dependencies is a
showstopper for integrating plPHP.  The build order has to be
	Postgres
	PHP (since its existing DB support requires Postgres to build)
	plPHP
so putting #1 and #3 into the same package is a no go.  Which is too
bad, but I see no good way around it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-04-04 16:18:06
Subject: Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-04 15:47:06
Subject: Re: DELETE ... USING

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-04-04 16:30:50
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous:From: Thomas F.O'ConnellDate: 2005-04-04 16:00:28
Subject: Re: Recovering real disk space

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group