Re: Disaster!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Disaster!
Date: 2004-01-31 04:54:45
Message-ID: 26500.1075524885@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca> writes:
> "gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu (Greg Stark)" stated in
> comp.databases.postgresql.hackers:
>> The traditional Unix filesystems certainly don't return errors at close.

> Why shouldn't the close() function return an error? If an invalid
> file handle was passed to it, it most certainly should indicate this

Of course. We're discussing the situation where no errors were reported
in prior syscalls --- in particular, open() succeeded.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2004-01-31 13:12:25 Undefined symbol "elog"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-31 04:36:37 Re: [PATCHES] v7.4.1 text_position() patch