Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Date: 2007-02-20 14:23:13
Message-ID: 26429.1171981393@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... Yes. The HOT-updated status of the root and all intermediate
> tuples is cleared and their respective ctid pointers are made
> point to themselves.

Doesn't that destroy the knowledge that they form a tuple chain?
While it might be that no one cares any longer, it would seem more
reasonable to leave 'em chained together.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-20 14:23:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2007-02-20 14:20:35
Subject: Re: ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-20 14:23:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-02-20 13:16:51
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group