Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-08 17:16:23
Message-ID: 263AF00C-9FD5-41DE-AA5E-62C5B18A64C2@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Jan 8, 2010, at 1:02 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Now, I'll second Greg Smith and Tom here, in that I think we need to run
> the last commitfest as usual, knowing that the outcome of the commitfest
> for any given patch is not "it made it" but "we reviewed it". It's still
> right for the project to bump a patch on resources ground rather than on
> technical merit, at the end of the commitfest.

+1

David

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-01-08 17:18:52
Subject: Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2010-01-08 17:14:53
Subject: Re: damage control mode

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group