Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Date: 2000-11-29 05:02:41
Message-ID: 26339.975474161@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>> We've called that routine s_lock for a *long* time, so it seems
>> like there must be some factor involved that I don't see just yet...

> Didn't your commit message say something about the TAS and NON-TAS
> paths being the same now? 

Yeah, but don't tell me you were running on a non-TAS platform...
that stuff didn't work...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2000-11-29 05:07:17
Subject: Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Previous:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2000-11-29 04:56:49
Subject: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group