Re: [PATCH] Clarify issues with SPI and C language function limitations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify issues with SPI and C language function limitations
Date: 2005-08-13 22:27:29
Message-ID: 26295.1123972049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Here is a patch to the documentation clarifying some minor issues.=20

> The first is to the main SPI documentation clarifying that SPI isn't
> available unless there is a current snapshot (leading to the "no
> snapshot has been set" error).

This is wrong.

> The second clarifies when the get_fn_expr_rettype() and
> get_fn_expr_argtype() functions can actually provide the information
> requested.

Except it doesn't actually tell you anything very definite ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-14 02:34:45 Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-13 22:24:01 Re: gettime() - a timeofday() alternative