Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses
Date: 2004-03-21 17:23:39
Message-ID: 26243.1079889819@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> This patch attempts to implement the idea, with safety in case the 
> packet is not immediately available.

Seems like you ought to be testing for failure returns from send() and
recv().  Also, what of EINTR from select()?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Sailesh KrishnamurthyDate: 2004-03-21 17:35:37
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-21 16:46:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] listening addresses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-21 18:11:49
Subject: Re: Syntax error reporting (was Re: [PATCHES] syntax error position "CREATE FUNCTION" bug fix)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-21 17:19:33
Subject: Re: listening addresses

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group