Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql under Windows is slow

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Pgsql Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgresql under Windows is slow
Date: 2002-01-31 15:16:42
Message-ID: 2624.1012490202@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> What I can do to get more preformance ?

Sounds like the answer is "stop using Windows 98".

Now that Dave mentions it, I do recall that it was Great Bridge's
people who had gotten pretty much the same numbers from their TPC-C
benchmark on Cygwin as on Linux.  I'm quite sure they'd have been
using a current-at-the-time Windows ... so, either NT or W2K.
Probably NT but I can't say that for certain.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-31 15:45:38
Subject: Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2002-01-31 11:50:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgresql under Windows is slow

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Radu-Adrian PopescuDate: 2002-01-31 15:36:38
Subject: Regression tests failed on 7.2rc2
Previous:From: Henshall, Stuart - WCPDate: 2002-01-31 13:43:12
Subject: Re: postgresql under Windows is slow

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group