Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is it worth adding one of those readonly GUC vars for XLOG_SEG_SIZE then?
[shrug...] Maybe. I just did it because we've seen one or two requests
about whether the size of the WAL overhead can be reduced for small
installations. I'm not sure it's something people will do regularly.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-02-12 05:39:55|
|Subject: pgsql-server/src/backend/commands vacuum.c vac ...|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2004-02-12 02:08:07|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-server/src backend/access/transam/xact.c ...|