Re: [HACKERS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Date: 2013-01-24 21:51:04
Message-ID: 26202.1359064264@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Would someone make the doc change outlined above? Thanks.

Sorry, I'd nearly forgotten about this issue. Will see about fixing the
docs. (It looks like some of the comments in execMain.c could use work
too.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-24 22:12:02 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Previous Message Joe Conway 2013-01-24 21:46:40 Re: PL/R Median Busts Commit (Postgres 9.1.6 + plr 8.3.0.13 on Ubuntu 12.10 64 bit)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-01-24 21:57:15 autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-01-24 21:07:36 Re: gistchoose vs. bloat