Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, Psql_General <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
Date: 2006-06-29 16:12:53
Message-ID: 262.1151597573@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> In the current setup the only reason for Postgres to have this data type at
> all is purely for legacy compatibility.

Yes.  So?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc MunroDate: 2006-06-29 16:22:35
Subject: Re: Index corruption
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-29 16:11:08
Subject: Re: Index corruption

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2006-06-29 16:18:12
Subject: Re: Database connectivity using a unix shell
Previous:From: Alan HodgsonDate: 2006-06-29 16:12:26
Subject: Re: Database connectivity using a unix shell

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group