| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |
| Date: | 2006-08-31 23:56:21 |
| Message-ID: | 26181.1157068581@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Ideally, we would get Python to tell us the right location, because "use lib64
>> if it exists" isn't the right solution.
>>
>> Is this fixed somewhere post 7.4?
> Yes, but it was never backported. See:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/config/python.m4
My recollection is that there are a number of interrelated changes going
on there, and that a backport would have to touch a lot more than just
the python stuff. So I'd recommend that it's not worth the trouble/risk.
But if you want to have a go at extracting a small patch from the CVS
history, have at it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-08-31 23:56:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-08-31 23:25:51 | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-08-31 23:56:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-31 20:05:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure |