Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Claudio Natoli" <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Date: 2004-03-26 19:11:27
Message-ID: 26161.1080328287@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> The third option is to redefine all these functions into our own, and
> implement our own emulation layer. This means our own select(), send(),
> recv() (more? I don't think so). And have these call the native winsock
> APIs (WSAEventSelect(), WSASend(), WSARecv() etc). These functions are
> designed to work in an APC environment. 

Pardon me for not having paid close enough attention, but what versions
of select() and friends are we relying on now?  Is it really reasonable
to think that we can do a better job without a large amount of effort?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-03-26 19:29:27
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-03-26 18:56:41
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group