From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"? |
Date: | 2005-12-06 05:42:05 |
Message-ID: | 26127.1133847725@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general |
"Florian G. Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Based on this email, should we be showing ROLE from SHOW ALL?
>> Only if you think we should be showing session_authorization too.
>> That was marked "no_show_all" quite a long time ago, and we have
>> not got complaints about it...
> Hm, but before 8.1 there was no "alter user set <variable> <value>", was
> there? So, a automatic way of retrieving all possible variables wasn't
> too important - at least not from a gui-tool perspektive..
I don't see the connection offhand ... but ALTER USER SET <variable>
has been around since 7.3, so this doesn't seem to support whatever
argument you intended to make.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Freddy91 (sent by Nabble.com) | 2005-12-06 10:57:57 | Re: Slony in pgAdmin |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-12-05 23:19:31 | Re: [GENERAL] Missing variable "role" in "pg_settings"? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-12-06 05:51:12 | Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-06 04:59:10 | Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 |