| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Date: | 2007-01-06 03:57:32 |
| Message-ID: | 25996.1168055852@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>> Ok, so when you need CRC's on a replicate (but not on the master) you
> Which sounds to me like a good reason to allow the option in
> recovery.conf as well...
Actually, I'm not seeing the use-case for a slave having a different
setting from the master at all?
"My backup server is less reliable than the primary."
"My backup server is more reliable than the primary."
Somehow, neither of these statements seem likely to be uttered by
a sane DBA ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-06 04:05:56 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-06 03:40:28 | Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-06 04:01:51 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-06 03:52:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow(). |