Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow().

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow().
Date: 2007-01-06 03:52:17
Message-ID: 25946.1168055537@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow?  I would prefer:
>     else if (errno == ERANGE && !isinf(result))

No objection to that, just don't take out the ERANGE test altogether
again ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-06 04:01:51
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-06 03:36:33
Subject: pgsql: Remove extra character added to top.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-06 03:57:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-06 03:21:25
Subject: Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group