Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow?  I would prefer:
>     else if (errno == ERANGE && !isinf(result))

No objection to that, just don't take out the ERANGE test altogether
again ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow(). at 2007-01-06 02:54:45 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in at 2007-01-06 04:01:51 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-01-06 04:01:51
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-01-06 03:36:33
	Subject: pgsql: Remove extra character added to top.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-01-06 03:57:32
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-01-06 03:21:25
	Subject: Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port