Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:52, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> a) simple C wrapper which can be SQL compatible .. with this wrapper
>> we don't need any changes in dump files .. but I thinking it's
>> impossible, because there are conflicts between functio'n names and
>> table's names.
> the new built in stuff should all be in pg_catalog schema, and the old stuff
> in public schema, so in theory it would work... example of conflict?
The problem is the pg_catalog entries would capture any unqualified
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2007-10-05 01:17:29|
|Previous:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2007-10-05 01:06:00|
|Subject: Re: tsearch2 wrapper|