Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:52, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> a) simple C wrapper which can be SQL compatible .. with this wrapper
>> we don't need any changes in dump files .. but I thinking it's
>> impossible, because there are conflicts between functio'n names and
>> table's names.

> the new built in stuff should all be in pg_catalog schema, and the old stuff 
> in public schema, so in theory it would work... example of conflict?

The problem is the pg_catalog entries would capture any unqualified
names.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: tsearch2 wrapper at 2007-10-05 01:06:00 from Robert Treat

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tatsuo Ishii	Date: 2007-10-05 01:17:29
	Subject: default_text_search_config
Previous:	From: Robert Treat	Date: 2007-10-05 01:06:00
	Subject: Re: tsearch2 wrapper