Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better if it just did the right thing automatically?
>> The sort of heuristic I'm envisioning would essentially do "replan every
>> time" for some number of executions, and give up only if it noticed that
>> it wasn't getting anything better than the generic plan. So you'd have
>> a fixed maximum overhead per session when the custom plan was useless,
>> and the Right Thing when it wasn't.
> Which is likely useless for my use case.
[ shrug... ] You'd better explain exactly why, if you want me to take
that objection seriously.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-02-28 04:28:12|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L')|
|Previous:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2010-02-28 04:20:38|
|Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.|