Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Date: 2006-11-05 18:28:34
Message-ID: 25914.1162751314@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After re-reading the above, it strikes me that maybe names based around
>> "freeze_min" and "freeze_max" would be useful?

> Works for me. They are clearly related, yet different and allow a
> straightforward explanation of their need and use.

Sold, I'll rename them before committing the patch.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2006-11-05 19:23:59
Subject: NULL in arrays
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-05 18:24:55
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2006-11-05 19:47:28
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-05 18:24:55
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group