Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION
Date: 2006-02-01 05:56:00
Message-ID: 25911.1138773360@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 10:28 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> What if that role has a maximum of one connection, etc.?

> Considering it would only be used when the alternative was to say
> "Sorry, tab completion unavailable", I really don't see these as
> problems -- fall back to saying it cannot be done.

The point is that this can hardly be claimed to be a "zero failure mode"
implementation, any more than is the method of saving the tab completion
list after first successful fetch.  Since the latter seems far simpler
and lower-overhead, I'd go with it...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-01 06:23:34
Subject: Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION
Previous:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2006-02-01 02:30:23
Subject: Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group