Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Back-port changes of Jan 16 and 17 to "revoke" pending fsync

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Back-port changes of Jan 16 and 17 to "revoke" pending fsync
Date: 2007-01-28 01:32:49
Message-ID: 25879.1169947969@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Could you please point me the discussion why we do not care 8.0
> regarding Windows specific issues? I could not find it...

It's not a completely done deal, but the folks listening in this
afternoon seemed to agree:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-01/msg01614.php

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 01:37:38
Subject: pgsql: Fix scalararraysel() to cope with binary-compatible cases, such
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-28 01:12:05
Subject: pgsql: Use sys_siglist[] to print out signal names for signal exits,

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group