Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch
Date: 2004-02-13 01:14:23
Message-ID: 25866.1076634863@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-pitr
Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com> writes:
> * The ability to force a WAL log switch to ensure all changes during the
> backup are flushed to archived logs and copied.

Why does that require a log switch?  You can copy the active log file in
any case.  (There was actually code to do that in J.R.'s patch, which I
disregarded because I see no point in it ...)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

Next:From: Cott LangDate: 2004-02-13 01:25:35
Subject: Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch
Previous:From: Cott LangDate: 2004-02-13 00:48:20
Subject: Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group