| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Date: | 2005-04-25 22:26:57 |
| Message-ID: | 25812.1114468017@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think everyone agrees this should only work in interactive mode. I
> think the only unknown is if it should be 'on' by default in interactive
> mode? Does it make sense to follow the standard in interactive mode if
> we don't follow it in non-interative mode?
I doubt it's a good idea to change the default for this at all; in
particular, making the default interactive behavior different from
the noninteractive behavior seems like a recipe for problems.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-25 22:34:23 | Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 21:52:49 | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-26 00:39:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 21:52:49 | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |