Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug?
Date: 2001-03-27 01:00:54
Message-ID: 2580.985654854@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

"Joe Shevland" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Semi-topical I hope ;)

Completely irrelevant to JDBC as far as I can see. I've redirected to
pghackers.

> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/115: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> ...
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6087: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6111: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6112: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6136: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6137: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
> This probably means the backend terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.

Ugh. It looks like something has clobbered your pg_attribute file.
Was this the first sign of trouble? Can you provide an "od -x" dump of
that file? (It'd be $PGDATA/base/DB2OID/1249; you'll need to look in
pg_database to determine the OID of db2.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcin Kowalski 2001-03-27 09:03:07 pg_dump potential bug
Previous Message Joe Shevland 2001-03-27 00:37:35 Possible large object bug?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mathijs Brands 2001-03-27 01:04:50 Regression test on FBSD 3.3 & 4.2, IRIX 6.5 (was Re: Re: Call for platforms)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-27 00:53:44 Re: Re: Call for platforms

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2001-03-27 11:04:26 Re: RE: Compiling
Previous Message Joe Shevland 2001-03-27 00:37:35 Possible large object bug?