| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | sugita(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rejection of the smallest int8 |
| Date: | 2001-11-21 22:15:04 |
| Message-ID: | 25751.1006380904@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Use strtoll/strtoull if available. They should be on "most" systems
> anyway.
Mph. The reason int8in is coded the way it is is to avoid having to
deal with strtoll configuration (does it exist? Is it the right thing?
Don't forget Alphas, where int8 == long). We'd still need a fallback
if it doesn't exist, so I'm not that excited about this answer.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-21 22:22:28 | Re: beta3 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-21 22:14:35 | Re: beta3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-22 02:28:44 | Re: More FK patches |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-21 22:13:58 | Re: Rejection of the smallest int8 |