Re: [INTERFACES] table very big !!!!!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Pablo Saul Salazar - CESERCOMP <ssalazar(at)goliat(dot)espol(dot)edu(dot)ec>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] table very big !!!!!
Date: 1999-11-23 00:06:49
Message-ID: 25736.943315609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> Ah, try running first vacuum; then vacuum analyze. The first one will
> truncate the table removing the wasted space. The second simply rebuilds
> some statistics about the table.

This is not right --- AFAICT, vacuum *always* runs the compaction phase.
You can allow or skip the stats-gathering phase by specifying "analyze"
or not, but "vacuum analyze" implies "vacuum".

It sounds like Pablo has a problem with vacuum not doing what it is
supposed to ... has anyone else ever seen that? It's a new one on me.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Byron Nikolaidis 1999-11-23 00:22:10 Re: [INTERFACES] weird Access problem
Previous Message Juan Colmenares 1999-11-22 23:20:40 A Question about Large Object