| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
| Date: | 2005-11-17 14:26:14 |
| Message-ID: | 25725.1132237574@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Now we're into 8.2devel mode, its time to submit the previously
>> discussed patch that:
>> - reduces Numeric storage format by 2 bytes
> This makes the often discussed binary upgrade impossible, so I wonder if
> two bytes savings are worth the trouble.
Unless someone actually steps forward and produces a working pg_upgrade
in the 8.2 timeframe, this objection is moot.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-17 14:49:10 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
| Previous Message | Bill Moseley | 2005-11-17 14:06:53 | Re: Wrong rows selected with view |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-17 14:34:08 | Re: tablespaces and non-empty directories |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-11-17 14:17:15 | Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-17 14:49:10 | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-11-17 14:04:42 | Re: drop if exists |