Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE
Date: 2006-09-02 14:46:07
Message-ID: 2568.1157208367@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the 
>> corresponding SQL commands.
>> 
>> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright 
>> mistake.

> Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
> people liked it.  I need someone else to say they want it reverted.

I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution.

As for "several people said they liked it", where?  I don't see even
one followup to
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-06/msg00049.php

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 14:46:42
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return composite
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-02 14:30:06
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 14:46:42
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return composite
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-02 14:30:06
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group