Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the 
>> corresponding SQL commands.
>> 
>> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright 
>> mistake.

> Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
> people liked it.  I need someone else to say they want it reverted.

I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution.

As for "several people said they liked it", where?  I don't see even
one followup to
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-06/msg00049.php

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE at 2006-09-02 14:00:40 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE at 2006-09-02 16:07:15 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-09-02 14:46:42
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return composite
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-09-02 14:30:06
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2006-09-02 14:46:42
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return composite
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2006-09-02 14:30:06
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same