Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bug in windows xp

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Wang Haiyong <wanghaiyong(at)neusoft(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in windows xp
Date: 2006-04-19 14:15:54
Message-ID: 25658.1145456154@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Not that I know of. However, the first step is to add this regression
> test for SIGFPE [-patches CCed].

This seems completely pointless.  The question is not about whether the
SIGFPE catcher works when fired, it's about what conditions trigger it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-04-19 14:38:17
Subject: Re: bug in windows xp
Previous:From: andrea suisaniDate: 2006-04-19 11:20:22
Subject: pg_dump or hardware?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-04-19 14:32:21
Subject: Re: Two coverity non-bugs
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-04-19 12:02:54
Subject: Two coverity non-bugs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group