Re: bug in windows xp

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Wang Haiyong <wanghaiyong(at)neusoft(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in windows xp
Date: 2006-04-19 14:15:54
Message-ID: 25658.1145456154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Not that I know of. However, the first step is to add this regression
> test for SIGFPE [-patches CCed].

This seems completely pointless. The question is not about whether the
SIGFPE catcher works when fired, it's about what conditions trigger it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-04-19 14:38:17 Re: bug in windows xp
Previous Message andrea suisani 2006-04-19 11:20:22 pg_dump or hardware?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-19 14:32:21 Re: Two coverity non-bugs
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-04-19 12:02:54 Two coverity non-bugs