Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Justin Clift <jclift(at)iprimus(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL
Date: 2001-03-14 16:32:01
Message-ID: 25642.984587521@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Instead we could run an empty test program before the real tests.  If an
> empty program fails to run we can abort in good conscience.

That sounds like a plan.  Do you want to do it, or shall I?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-14 16:56:44
Subject: Re: modulo operator bug?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-03-14 16:28:07
Subject: Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group