Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation
Date: 2002-04-15 02:10:26
Message-ID: 2563.1018836626@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Isn't the "cmds" in the file names kind of redundant?

That was at my suggestion, actually. I thought names like "aggregate.c"
were too generic --- too easy to confuse with similarly-named files
elsewhere in the tree. (For example, I regularly get confused by the
existence of analyze.c in both commands/ and parser/.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-15 03:09:09 Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-15 02:08:52 Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation