Re: Seq scans status update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Seq scans status update
Date: 2007-06-02 18:08:45
Message-ID: 25616.1180807725@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
> The mailing list archives contain the ample evidence of:
> - it's definitely an L2 cache effect
> - on fast I/O hardware tests show large benefits of keeping the ring in L2

Please provide some specific pointers, because I don't remember that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-06-02 20:19:15 Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2007-06-02 17:47:58 Re: Seq scans status update